James Franco proved himself the King of Hollywood this past weekend. Despite mixed reviews for his performance in the title role of Oz the Great and Powerful, he helped power the film to an international blockbuster debut. The 34-year old, Oscar-nominated actor/filmmaker also received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame on March 7th, further cementing — literally — his industry immortality.
I found Franco’s performance one of the better, more
genuine things about Disney’s given-to-excess adaptation of the classic
L. Frank Baum books and, more directly, prequel to 1939’s beloved movie
musical The Wizard of Oz.
His Oscar Diggs, known to his associates (since he doesn’t have any
friends) as “Oz,” starts out as a sideshow magician in 1905 Kansas
prior to being whisked away by a tornado to that vibrantly Technicolor world
“somewhere over the rainbow.” Once there, he is proclaimed
the fulfillment of a prophecy that a man bearing the same name as the land of
Oz would descend from the sky and ascend the long-vacant throne. Diggs is
initially reluctant to be proclaimed wizard but becomes much more amenable once
he is shown the massive treasure that awaits whoever proves worthy of the
realm.
First, though, he must defeat the Wicked Witch who, with her
army of marauding flying baboons, has been terrorizing the countryside.
Rachel Weisz, Mila Kunis and Michelle Williams play the film’s trio of
enchantresses. Williams makes a wonderful Glinda and Weisz is fine as her
shadier counterpart, but Kunis struck me as lacking when she has to kick into
full sorceress mode (her obvious prosthetic make-up doesn’t help either).
Then again, she is competing against Margaret Hamilton’s turn in the
original movie. This new Oz
only serves to reinforce the indelibility of Hamilton and so many other elements of the
MGM classic.
Director Sam Raimi makes more than a few nods to The Wizard of Oz, most of them welcome,
including the opening transition from full-frame black and white to
widescreen color and cameo appearances by the Scarecrow and the Cowardly Lion.
As visually spectacular as much of the new film is, however, some visual
effects sequences go on far too long. The chief offenders are Diggs’
white-river rafting/waterfall plunging experience when his balloon first
touches down in Oz and several characters’ bubble-borne journey to
Munchkinland. Such excesses may look great in 3D (in which I did not view
the film) but are seemingly endless and probably add five non-essential minutes
to the film’s running time. Parents of young children should also
be cautioned about a scene where the bad witches publicly torture Glinda; I don’t
remember that from the original Baum tales! Still, Oz the Great and Powerful is on the whole
engaging and entertaining.
Back to Franco. He is more understated than the
initially-cast Robert Downey, Jr. likely would have been in the role but
Franco’s natural sincerity rings true, especially at those moments when
Diggs wrestles with his insincere tendencies. While Franco is good with
his female co-stars, his best scenes tend to be with non-human creations: a
lovely little girl made of porcelain (dubbed “China Girl”) and a
less-vicious, bellhop-dressed winged monkey who serves as his valet.
Franco also wisely avoids jokiness throughout, something Downey, Jr. — good
as he might have been — probably wouldn’t have been able to resist.
For full James Franco real-ness though, gay and other,
adventurous viewers must check out Interior.Leather Bar., one of his several other current projects. (He
is in Spring Breakers, opening
this Friday, and produced the porn documentary Kink,
which is currently making festival rounds.) Franco co-directed the movie
with gay filmmaker Travis Mathews, and both appear in it.
Interior. Leather Bar. serves as a
fascinating rumination on the current state of GLBT acceptance in society via a
graphic re-creation of missing footage from 1980’s controversial Cruising. William Friedkin’s
suspense film starred Al Pacino as a cop who goes undercover in New York City’s
leather community to hunt down a murderer. Even before its release, the
film was criticized for allegedly stereotyping members of the community. It
was heavily edited as a result, with a rumored 40 minutes of more sexually-explicit
content left on the cutting room floor. Cruising
still bombed upon its release and has been little remembered apart from its infamy, until now.
The latest in Franco’s ongoing, apparently deepening interest
in gay topics (witness his previous turns in Milk,
Howl and The Broken Tower,
the latter of which he also directed), Interior.
Leather Bar. intersperses sex scenes, interviews with cast members
prior to the filming of the sex scenes, and private conversations between
Franco, Mathews and/or Val Lauren, their Pacino doppelganger. Lauren is
quite good if, as a straight man who claims to have had no homosexual
experiences, he is understandably uncomfortable with the man-on-man action
going on around him. Franco is himself uncomfortably but amusingly wide-eyed
at one point while apparently watching an off-camera fisting scene.
The men’s discomfort, though, sparks insightful
dialogue about the representation of GLBT life and issues on film. At one
point, Lauren bluntly asks Franco how he can be making such a movie while in
production on the much-ballyhooed, family-friendly Oz prequel. Franco responds inspirationally, speaking
about his unhappiness at being raised in a country and culture that taught him
to consider gay sex and gay people as unnatural or lesser-than. He also states
or at least implies that if his exploration of such topics limits his options
in Hollywood,
then so be it.
I didn’t need another reason to admire Franco, even
after his admittedly disappointing Oscar-hosting gig in 2011, but his recent
output including Interior. Leather Bar.
has made me a true Franco-phile.
Reverend’s Ratings:
Oz the Great and Powerful: B-
Interior. Leather Bar.: B+
Review by Rev. Chris Carpenter, resident film critic of Movie Dearest, Rage Monthly Magazine and Echo Magazine.
2 comments:
I have to respectfully disagree about Franco; I found his performance flat and one-dimensional. I kept up hope that he would show some depth of character -- but nothing. I ultimately enjoyed the picture, it was a spectacle to watch. Wouldn't it have been more fun if the Wizard didn't get ALL the girls?
-Chris Mosio
Cinematographer
I, too, disagree with the assessment of Franco's performance. He has a cute smile, but his inability to deliver even the simplest of lines with any real conviction was a letdown for me. He was largely wooden, and almost irrelevant in his two-dimensional portrayal. I like Franco, but think his acting skills, what little there are, could really use some attention. Just imagine Johnny Depp in this role, and you can easily see why Franco just wasn't the man/boy for the job. The China doll stole the show, along with Michelle Williams. Gave the film a mediocre C, largely due to its spectacular special effects.
Post a Comment